I'm running FC1 and going through my /var/log/messages I ran into a lot of lines like the following:
endpoint is not connected
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3453]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam (libwrap=fam) from <no address>
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3454]: warning: can't get client address: Transport endpoint is not connected
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3454]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam (libwrap=fam) from <no address>
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3455]: warning: can't get client address: Transport endpoint is not connected
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3455]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam (libwrap=fam) from <no address>
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3456]: warning: can't get client address: Transport endpoint is not connected
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3456]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam (libwrap=fam) from <no address>
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3457]: warning: can't get client address: Transport endpoint is not connected
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3457]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam (libwrap=fam) from <no address>
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3458]: warning: can't get client address: Transport endpoint is not connected
Dec 21 15:29:21 eunix xinetd[3458]: libwrap refused connection to sgi_fam (libwrap=fam) from <no address>
Everything seems to be working fine, but I was just curious about the error messages. I run a 56k connection on ppp0 which does not come up until I bring it up. Just curious about this.
On a related note, with FC1, in order to use my normal .bashrc alias to connect, I had to copy
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-name_of_my_ISP to
/etc/sysconfig/network-scriptsetc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-pp0
to set up an alias of connect='/sbin/ifup ppp0'
I suppose this is an improvement or a feature but I have run into it in every FC1 install I have done (about 4 or so) and I find it to be a bit annoying. Using "neat" to connect through its GUI allows connections easily enough, and I guess if I knew anything about kppp or any of the other GUI dialers it would be fine. It just seems like a step backwards; kind of Microsoftish to me.
Just my $.02
Jim Dishaw


