Basher52 wrote:hmm, im getting dizzy here => rating=crap, lol
i cant SAY how i understood you, but ill try to show it.
...
but as i understood you, apg-get will ONLY do this on ONE level, the rest will work, like, ONLY have to install bbb.rpm manually and the ddd and ccc will get installed, but yum wont do that.
did i get you right?
not really.
apt and yum are supposed to resolve dependencies automatically. if i install one thing, mplayer for instance, i only need to do "apt-get install mplayer". The mplayer rpm depends on a whole whack of other things (codecs and so forth) which are automatically installed too. That's it. It's easy.
The problems arise when your package isn't in an apt repo which you have defined in your sources.list files. If that is the case, then you could do "rpm -Uvh nameofrpm.rpm" and find out what it depends on from the error message, then do "apt-get install dependencyname" to install your dependency. if that one has any dependencies itself, they will be installed automatically by apt. This will avoid you having to search for your dependencies one by one from the error messages.
This is why apt is superior to hunting the rpms down yourself, and it appears that you haven't seen this to be the case, judging by what you have said. As for yum only recursing down one level through the dependencies, i have no idea. this is because i think yum is rubbish, and anyway apt is fine, so i haven't had to resort to yum. I am not one of the many people who believe that if something's not broken, it should be fixed until it is. I will say however that a network based package upgrade manager would be almost as worthless as no package manager at all to me if it can only recurse down by one level of dependencies. I used to use mandrake, so i know how painful it can be trying to keep all your packages up to date!
Secondly, i might note in passing that as i read through this thread i find it staggering how little information you've given. Void main has asked time and again for specifics and every time you have not answered his questions! don't get me wrong, i'm not having a go at you but i do think it very funny indeed how often i see this on forums such as these, that the person having a problem has others running around trying to fix it for them, and yet they are not willing to post any actual error messages or any real data concerning the problem. If i had a problem, i would recreate it on the command line and then copy the entire block into my post as an appendix.
have a look here for an example of a thread that's full of helpful lines of output!