by worker201 » Tue Nov 30, 2004 12:31 pm
That's not entirely uncorrect, either. Given the amount of money and research that was devoted to computing technology at the time, and assuming a linear extrapolation over 50 years, that's exactly what a computer would look like today. However, for whatever reasons (probably military, based on missile defense), computer technology grew algebraically instead of linearly. Moore's Law and all that. There is no way anyone in the 50s would have any idea how much time and effort and money would be shoveled into the computer.
I personally believe that someone from the 50s would be more impressed with a cheap pocket calculator than a modern personal computer. The advances in GUI and data storage/processing power would not be very impressive to them, without a frame of reference. However, the fact that really difficult logarithmic and square root problems can be solved by tapping a couple buttons would blow them away, since such problems had to be worked out laboriously by hand for 1000s of years.