deb vs. rpm

Place to discuss anything, almost. No politics, religion, Microsoft, or anything else that I (the nazi censor) deem inappropriate.

deb vs. rpm

Postby Master of Reality » Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:50 pm

Anyone know the difference between deb and rpm packages. Mostly i've found arguments in newsgroups and such arguing which one is better, with no real information about them.
Master of Reality
guru
guru
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 8:25 pm

Postby Void Main » Tue Feb 28, 2006 9:00 pm

They are basically the same thing, just different ways of packaging. They serve the same basic purpose and they both have very similar features. deb files are nothing more than a tar.gz file and a control file bundled together in an archive (use the "ar" command to extract the files directly). If you wanted to know the physical format of an RPM file here is an explanation:

http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-file- ... rmat.htmlg

As far as I am concerned it is 6 of one, half dozen of the other. I am more familiar with building RPM packages though and for me I find them a little easier to work with (if you have to build or change a package). Here is an excellent comparison of the different packaging formats:

http://www.kitenet.net/~joey/pkg-comp/
User avatar
Void Main
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5705
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 5:24 am
Location: Tuxville, USA

Postby X11 » Thu Mar 02, 2006 4:30 am

Well, that link about package format further concludes that Solaris is CRAP, actually if I ever have my own Media empire, I am going to make sure it gets the Worst Unix of the Year award or something. Having used it, I think it is terrible, and unlike most free BSD and Linux distributions, very poorly documented.
X11
guru
guru
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 11:09 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Void Main » Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:59 am

X11 wrote:Well, that link about package format further concludes that Solaris is CRAP,


I am pretty sure I told you this when you were looking at that sparc box. I'm not a fan either and I've had to deal with it quite a bit over the last 10 years. Fortunately Linux now gets first choice whenever something new goes in.
User avatar
Void Main
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5705
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 5:24 am
Location: Tuxville, USA

Postby Master of Reality » Tue Mar 14, 2006 3:11 pm

I think the easiest thing for me to do to compare, is... install Fedora Core 5 on my Desktop, and install Debian on my serverish computer.
Master of Reality
guru
guru
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 8:25 pm

Postby X11 » Mon Apr 03, 2006 12:20 pm

Void Main wrote:
X11 wrote:Well, that link about package format further concludes that Solaris is CRAP,


I am pretty sure I told you this when you were looking at that sparc box. I'm not a fan either and I've had to deal with it quite a bit over the last 10 years. Fortunately Linux now gets first choice whenever something new goes in.


Yeah, it is running gentoo now and it is very very nice. Only I am constantly finding problems with some programs that either: contain i386 asm or are little endian only. However I must say it runs quite nicely.
X11
guru
guru
 
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2003 11:09 pm
Location: Australia


Return to The Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron