Void Main wrote:Hey Creedon, er, I mean bullgoose.

I like both Red Hat and Debian. They are both great each in their own way. I have to admit that I use and have used Red Hat by far the most since they first appeared many years ago. I really like RH8 and RH9 even though I was initially horrified when I first installed RH8, I now realize it's an overall positive move forward. Debian is, well, Debian, probably the most awesome all around distro there is.
Hi Void; long time no see. Yeah, you've pretty much summed up my problem; Redhat's last two releases are a definite step toward main-stream adoption of Linux for the desktop. I know that there's a lot of conjecture in the community about the Bluecurve desktop, but it's really going to appeal to the WIN XP crowd, at least by its looks. I'm hoping that when Debian Sarge becomes the Stable branch that the promised GUI installer is as nice as the Redhat installer; that will be a big plus in Debian's favor; the current installer is a pain in the ass, and just too damned technical for a potential WIN convert to attempt. Linux is maturing rapidly; things have changed so much in the four years I've been playing with it, I can't believe it.
Anyway, I'm still torn between two loves; Redhat is real pretty, but the package manager still leaves me cold. I tried apt-rpm for RH 8.0, but it ran into dependancy problems, and I haven't had time to try it for RH 9.0. If Redhat gets its head out of its ass and makes apt-rpm the default, there's no contest. But (BIG but), I still love the Debian philosophy, and the stability of Debian is a HUGE selling point; plus apt-get works out of the box.
I guess I should't bitch; I've got two winning choices; I can't loose!
