Wiping Windows partition

Place to discuss anything, almost. No politics, religion, Microsoft, or anything else that I (the nazi censor) deem inappropriate.

Wiping Windows partition

Postby Ice9 » Mon Apr 14, 2003 3:32 am

This weekend I went to a lan-party and while I'm attending such events on a regular basis this was actually the first time where I was determined to try and NOT boot Windows at all.
I had to boot win2K after all, but the problems I encountered were due to sheer user incompetence (as is so often the case).
Once I resolved the issues I had (a missing parameter in a control panel of DCGUI) I stayed in RH and didn't look back anymore.

In fact this weekend I realized that I had no need for windows at all anymore, if some application is not available for Linux (such as Internet banking at my bank) I will simply not use it at all and try to make them make it available for Linux.

This brings me to my question.
My harddrive setup is like this at hte moment
hda1: Win2K Fat32 10GB
hda2: Fat32 partition 30GB
hdb1: ext3 partition 40GB
hdb2: RH8 40GB

I guess I could fdisk hda1 and hda2 and convert the partitions to ext3, leave everything else as is and continue to use my existing installation.
But wouldn't it be better to physically swap the drives, making hdb becoming hda or wouldn't that make any difference? (both are 7200 rpm drives but the 80GB has 8MB cache and is slightly faster)

And if I did that, would I only have to change a few entries to grub.conf and fstab or are there other things to take into consideration as well?

One thing I probably will be stuck with is that RH8 will alwas be on the second partition of the WD 80GB drive, but I'd like to swap in a new drive probably a WD 200GB and I'd like to make the setup as smooth as possible.
Ice9
guru
guru
 
Posts: 577
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2003 12:40 am
Location: Belgium

Postby agent007 » Sat May 31, 2003 10:54 am

Yes, u can swap the HDD's without making any changes to the grub.conf file....

007
agent007
administrator
administrator
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 11:26 pm

Postby Tux » Sat May 31, 2003 11:05 am

You would definitely have to change the grub.conf.
The drive path to the redhat kernel would have to be changed from (1,1) to (0,1) and the root option for the kernel would also have to be passed correctely.
Tux
guru
guru
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 10:40 am

Postby agent007 » Sat May 31, 2003 11:08 am

My disc was 1st in the primary IDE channel hda....due to some problems, i had to change it to hdc and that didnt require any changes in the grub.conf......

007
agent007
administrator
administrator
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 11:26 pm

Postby Tux » Sat May 31, 2003 11:12 am

Because grub was installed on that disc. I was assuming he had grub installed on his first disk, either way he can make it work very easily.
Tux
guru
guru
 
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2003 10:40 am

Postby agent007 » Sat May 31, 2003 11:15 am

Oops!! Ur right......I didnt think that he had 2 HDD's..

007 8)
agent007
administrator
administrator
 
Posts: 254
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 11:26 pm


Return to The Lounge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron