my article about gnu/linux' history
here's my article. i know it's rootatoot tooting a bit on my own trumpet to start a whole new topic about it here and all that but well i've done it now.
what do you think of what i have said and what i have not said. is there anything that should have been left out, anything that should be included or anything (especially) that i have said that is WRONG? (for example i am not sure if what i said about the state of minix (regarding licencing) and bsd (regarding availability and possibly licencing) at the time of linux' inception is correct).
what do you think of what i have said and what i have not said. is there anything that should have been left out, anything that should be included or anything (especially) that i have said that is WRONG? (for example i am not sure if what i said about the state of minix (regarding licencing) and bsd (regarding availability and possibly licencing) at the time of linux' inception is correct).